Evaluation Rubric Example

In schools and educational institutes, each teacher has their own way of evaluating their students, but there are standardized methods that can even be adapted to various educational levels. An example of this is evaluation rubrics.

It is a matrix in which the competences that students had to fulfill in order to carry out a job or any other task, such as creating an essay , for example, are evaluated . There, criteria and other factors are evaluated that will conclude that the students have managed to learn.

Thus, the objective of the evaluation rubrics is to know what the student learned and therefore the teacher can also know if he should modify his teaching methods. This, then, is a way of evaluating and learning at the same time. In fact, students will know if they need to try harder in some aspects of their education because with this matrix they will get information about their line of learning.

Types of rubrics

  • Global rubrics. It offers general information about the student (s), linked to the main learning standards.
  • Analytical rubrics. Contrary to the previous one, they define more specific tasks to know the capacity of the student by creating only one type of product, such as an article, for example.
Examples of evaluation rubrics

These examples specify the elements to be evaluated in each type of work done by the students, as well as the assessment that the teacher must give according to the competencies achieved. Points range from 1 to 4.

  • Oral presentation rubric


4. Pronounce words correctly and vocalize well.

3. Pronounce the words correctly but their vocalization is incorrect.

2. Make mistakes both in pronunciation and in vocalization.

1. He makes mistakes in pronunciation, even though his vocalization is correct.


4. The volume is appropriate to the situation.

3. Raises your voice too much in exposure.

2. Speak too low when exposing.

1. It exhibits very low, you can hardly hear it.


4. Your posture is natural, looking at the audience continuously.

3. Look at the audience, but it is supported somewhere.

2. Sometimes he turns his back on the public.

1. Does not address the public when exhibiting.


4. Exposes the specific content, without leaving the topic.

3. Exposes content and sometimes gets off topic.

2. Exposes the content, although some data is missing.

1. The exhibition lacks specific content.


4. Use extra support material to make yourself understood better.

3. Make appropriate use of documentation during the exhibition.

2. Little reference to images or supporting documents.

1. Does not use support material in the oral presentation.


4. Good structure and sequencing of exposure.

3. Fairly neat display.

2. Make mistakes and repetitions in the logical order of ideas.

1. Repeat the ideas continuously and the presentation lacks order.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Check Also